Dining table ten:Means and you may Simple Deviations of one’s Polyamorous Test Considering Most recent Dating Types of and you may Comfort and ease with Disclosure to help you Psychological state Masters.
As well as be seen inside Desk eleven, pairwise reviews found that polyamorous individuals already for the non-committed nonmonogamous relationship stated down complete dating fulfillment (while the counted from the GMREL complete measure score) than simply polyamorous anybody within the monogamous relationship (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous relationship (p=0.00), nonhierarchical non-monogamous relationship (p=0.00), moving relationships (p=0.00), triad relationship (p=0.00), polyfidelity relationships (p=0.00), polyfamily relationship (p=0.00), tribe/ pod relationship (p=0.00), “other” matchmaking (p=0.00), and you will polyamorous individuals who stated that they certainly were “undecided” regarding their latest relationships method of (p=0.00).
Difference in most recent dating types of and you may sexual pleasure just like the measured of the the brand new GMSEX
47; F(eleven,6018)=, p=0.00). Follow-right up univariate ANOVAs unearthed that you will find a distinction between latest relationship kind of towards the all dimensions of the latest GMSEX: Aspect 1 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement dos (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement step three (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement 4 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement 5 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), in addition to full measure get, overall relationships satisfaction (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00). To recognize hence matchmaking items differed where almost every other relationship systems, pairwise reviews were conducted (Tukey HSD).
As well as rise above the crowd from inside the Table 12, pairwise evaluations learned that polyamorous some one currently from inside the non-the time nonmonogamous relationship stated that its latest intimate matchmaking was indeed reduced satisfying (as the counted because of the Dimensions step 1 with the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous somebody in the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you will polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00). Pairwise evaluations unearthed that polyamorous people already for the monogamous relationships advertised the most recent dating was indeed quicker fulfilling (as the measured by Dimension 1 towards the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some body into the swinging (p=0.05) and you may polyfamily dating(p=0.04). Pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous individuals currently for the “other” understood relationships reported the intimate dating was faster satisfying (as measured by the Dimensions step 1 with the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous anybody during the low-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.03), swinging (p=0.01), and you may polyfamily relationship (p=0.01). Additionally, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous those who defined as “undecided” regarding their current relationships kind of reported that the sexual dating was basically shorter fulfilling (because measured because of the Aspect step 1 toward GMSEX) than polyamorous somebody inside swinging matchmaking (p=0.05).
As can be seen inside the Table thirteen, pairwise evaluations found that polyamorous somebody when you look at the non-committed low-monogamous dating stated that its newest intimate relationships was indeed reduced rewarding (since counted by the Measurement 2 on the GMSEX) than just polyamorous someone within the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and polyfamily relationships (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting unearthed that polyamorous somebody already into the monogamous matchmaking stated its intimate relationships was in fact reduced rewarding (as the counted by the Dimensions dos with the GMSEX) than just polyamorous individuals inside non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.04) and polyfamily dating (p=0.03). At exactly the same time, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous people who recognized as “undecided” within latest matchmaking form of stated that their sexual dating was basically reduced fulfilling (since measured because of the Aspect 2 on the GMSEX) than polyamorous somebody into the moving (p=0.05) and you can polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.02).
Multivariate evaluation have been conducted and discovered there try a life threatening difference in most recent matchmaking brands toward an excellent linear blend of proportions of sexual satisfaction and you will overall sexual joy as measured of the GMSEX (Wilks’ Lambda=0
As well as rise above the crowd for the Dining table fourteen, pairwise evaluations learned that polyamorous anyone from inside the low-the time low-monogamous relationships stated that their newest intimate relationships had been less rewarding (since the measured of the Dimensions step three to your GMSEX) than polyamorous people during the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily dating (p=0.00). consejos para salir con sud Pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous some one inside the monogamous matchmaking stated that their most recent intimate dating was in fact shorter satisfying (given that measured by Aspect step three towards GMSEX) than just polyamorous anyone during the polyfamily relationships (p=0.02). At the same time, pairwise evaluations found that polyamorous some body from inside the polyfamily relationship stated that the most recent sexual matchmaking was basically as pleasing (given that measured because of the Measurement step 3 towards the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some one from inside the “other” relationship (p=0.02) and you may polyamorous people that defined as “undecided” within newest relationships type of (p=0.01).
Bec Geyer